On Weakening the Law of Excluded Middle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9686868 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Douglas Odegard (Lakehead University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 232-236 |
| Publication date | 1966-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300037690 |
| OpenAlex | W2156516235 |
| Language | EN |
Let us use ‘false’ and ‘not true’ (and cognates) in such a way that the latter expression covers the broader territory of the two; in other words, a statement's falsity implies its non-truth but not vice versa. For example, ‘John is ill’ cannot be false without being nontrue; but it can be non-true without being false, since it may not be true when ‘John is not ill’ is also not true, a situation we could describe by saying ‘It is neither the case that John is ill nor the case that John is not ill.’
Epistemology · Expression (computer science) · Falsity · Law of excluded middle · Political science · Statement (logic) · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |