Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Getting the Baseline Right—or—Why I’m Right and Everyone Else is Wrong, in each of the Two Senses of ‘Why’

Bibliographic Data

ID9687151
AuthorsPAUL VIMINITZ (University of Lethbridge, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume55
Issue4
Pages739-757
Publication date2016-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0012217316000676
OpenAlexW2564925869
LanguageEN
References cited4

My fellow contractarians and I are of a mind that it would be irrational to comply with a distribution of the cooperative dividend that worsens one’s condition. But worse than what? According to David Gauthier et al. , it’s non-interaction, i.e., what would be the case were the negotiators never to have met. I argue that it’s what would be the case in the absence of their coming to an agreement. As it turns out, this distinction can be, and often is, a matter of life and death

Baseline (sea) · Dividend · Economics · Epistemology · Irrational number · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Free Will and Agency · Law · Legal principles and applications · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Anarchy, State, and Utopia•1975

  • Non-contractual Society

    Open Access•Virginia Held•Canadian Journal of Philosophy…•1987

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae