Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Wolfson on Spinoza's Use of the More Geometrico

Bibliographic Data

ID9687436
AuthorsJohn De Lucca (University of Victoria, corresponding author)
Year1967
Volume6
Issue1
Pages89-102
Publication date1967-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s001221730003523x
OpenAlexW2143120462
LanguageEN
References cited5

In Chapter II of his work The Philosophy of Spinoza , Wolfson accepts Descartes' distinction between the geometrical method of philosophizing and the geometrical form of literary exposition. The geometrical method of philosophizing is a method of demonstration and is essentially identical with “valid syllogistic reasoning as practised throughout the history of philosophy.” The geometrical form of literary exposition is one modelled after the literary form of Euclid's Elements . Wolfson proceeds to present two theses which serve as the premises of a conclusion respecting the relation between form and content in Spinoza's Ethics . The first thesis is that as a consequence of Spinoza's “mathematical way of looking at things” the geometrical method “is adopted by Spinoza and used consistently in his discussions of metaphysical matters throughout his chief philosophic work.” The second thesis is to the effect that there is no logical connection between the geometrical method of philosophizing and the geometrical literary form of exposition, i.e., a geometrizing philosopher, e.g., Descartes, need not employ the geometrical literary form. From these theses, serving as premises, Wolfson concludes that “there is no logical connection between the substance of Spinoza's philosophy and the form in which it is written” and, hence, “his choice of the Euclidian geometrical form is to be explained on other grounds.” Wolfson proceeds to present four possible reasons which, either individually or conjointly, may lie behind Spinoza's employment of the geometrical literary form: (1) on pedagogical grounds, (2) in reaction against certain literary forms which had developed since the Renaissance, (3) to avoid arguing against his opponents, and (4) for the sake of novelty

Art · Connection (principal bundle) · Epistemology · Euclidean geometry · Exposition (narrative) · Geometry · Literature · Metaphysics · Relation (database) · Syllogism · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • The Philosophical Works of Descartes

    Elizabeth S Haldane, G R T Ross•The Philosophical Works of…•1934

  • Spinoza

    Frederick Pollock•The Philosophical Review•1900

  • Benedict de Spinoza

    David Savan, H F Hallett•The Philosophical Review•1959

  • Benedict de Spinoza--The Elements of His Philosophy

    Aaron Wernham, A G Wernham et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1963

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae