God Loves Us”
Theology and Falsification Reexamined
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9687589 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gary G Colwell, Gary Colwell (Medicine Hat College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 229-237 |
| Publication date | 1983-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300017959 |
| OpenAlex | W2138130406 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Some have argued that because factually meaningful assertions must be falsifiable, putative theistic assertions such as “God loves us” are not meaningful because they are not falsifiable. It is further suggested that every attempt to make a factually significant theistic assertion founders on the same shoal of falsifiability
Assertion · Epistemology · Falsifiability · Theism · Computer Science · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Highly cited | No |
|---|