The Dramatic Aspect of Plato's Phaedo
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9687606 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kenneth Dorter (University of Guelph, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 564-580 |
| Publication date | 1970-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300050496 |
| OpenAlex | W2024044625 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
It has often been remarked that the dramatic element of the Platonic writings is unique in philosophy, and there have been many attempts to account for its presence. Recently there has been a greater tendency to see it as more than mere ornamentation or naturalism, as an essential element in understanding the philosophy of the dialogue. The one unquestionably authentic statement by Plato on philosophical writing is in the Phaedrus where Socrates, who wrote no philosophy, is made to criticize treatises because, among other things, a treatise “rolls everywhere, equally to those who understand it and to those for whom it is not fitting, and does not know to whom it should speak and to whom not” (275e). Plato, who did write philosophy, wrote no treatises, and it is reasonable to expect that he regarded the dialogue form which he employed as free from the objections to treatises
Art · Element (criminal law) · Epistemology · Literature · Naturalism · SOCRATES · Statement (logic) · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 1977 - 2024 (48) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |