Mysticism and Morality

In The Moral Mystic James Home has written a sequel to his Beyond Mysticism , where he ably explored a variety of philosophical issues arising from mysticism. This time his study has a special focus, and he makes an important contribution to the ongoing philosophical discussion of relations between religion and morality. As Home notes, “There is a very wide consensus in the philosophic world that religion and morality are independent of each other and that we can produce reliable moral judgments independently, with no need for religious guidance” (95). Home agrees that a non-religious morality is a reasonable option, but he claims that a religious commitment and perspective can sometimes intelligibly and legitimately affect an agent's morality. He supports this claim, not by an abstract argument, but by a descriptive analysis of the reflective process which goes on in a particular kind of religious person whom he calls the “moral mystic”. Why appeal to mysticism to show that religion can be positively and rationally relevant to morality? Such an appeal is initially implausible, for philosophers and others have severely criticized mystics for being amoral and perhaps even immoral. Home begins his book with a summary of such criticisms, but he claims that they apply to “pure” mystics rather than to his moral mystics. This distinction between mystics is crucial for his thesis

Appeal · Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Morality · Mysticism · Political science · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Religious studies · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

• The heterosexual body as metaphor in Plato's religious city

  Michel Despland•Religion•1991

  Add to list

• Ethics and Mysticism in Eastern Mystical Traditions

  Open Access•Steven T Katz•Religious Studies•1992

  Add to list

• The Moral Prism

  Open Access•Dorothy Emmet•The Moral Prism•1979

  Add to list