Taking Reflective Equilibrium Seriously
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9687966 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W E Cooper, Wesley Cooper (0009-0009-3881-6754, University of Alberta, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 548-555 |
| Publication date | 1981-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300023611 |
| OpenAlex | W1976446719 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
In the essay “Justice and Rights” of his book Taking Rights Seriously Ronald Dworkin puts forward an account of reflective equilibrium which has become an orthodoxy in interpreting John Rawls' theory of justice. My purpose here is to challenge this account, on the grounds that it presupposes an untenable view of the relation between belief and choice
Economic Justice · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Neoclassical economics · Orthodoxy · Political science · Positive economics · Primary goods · Reflective equilibrium · Relation (database) · Sociology · Theology · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |