Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

McRae on Innate Ideas

A Rejoinder

Bibliographic Data

ID9688006
AuthorsMurray Miles (0000-0002-8473-6191, Brock University, corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume27
Issue1
Pages29-30
Publication date1988-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0012217300019466
OpenAlexW2017633128
LanguageEN

It will come as no surprise that I have a different interpretation of the four passages in which, McRae claims, Descartes “definitely includes extension and its modes in what is given through the senses”. In the first, Descartes includes extension, etc., among his ideas of corporeal bodies . This is not to say that he includes them among his adventitious ideas , though. All adventitious ideas are ideas of external bodies. But the converse is not true. Not all ideas of corporeal bodies are ipso facto adventitious ideas, for, as I see it, the idea of the true and immutable nature of body is non-sensible and innate. McRae slides from “all adventitious ideas seem to be ideas of external bodies” to “all ideas of external bodies (including extension) are adventitious”

Aesthetics · Converse · Epistemology · Extension (predicate logic) · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Movement (music) · Sociology · Surprise · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Communication · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae