Sleigh's Leibniz and Arnauld

R. C. Sleigh's Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence is a very good book: it is detailed, clearly written, well argued and attentive to the historical background. The more I read it, the more I enjoyed it and the more I learned. Not only does it offer a wide variety of interesting points for the reader to agree and disagree with, it has, also, the virtue of pretty well forcing the reader to think about the issues involved and their connection with a variety of other philosophical problems. It breaks a good deal of new ground and, as is the way with new ground-breaking, it sometimes (explicitly) only scratches the surface: it points out both the need for further, more detailed investigations and the way in which such investigations might fruitfully proceed. By and large, however, it does a great deal more than scratch the surface: its depth of discussion is such that only a comparably sized book could hope to discuss in all their ramifications the problems raised (and often solved) by Sleigh

Common ground · Epistemology · Forcing (mathematics) · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Virtue · Artificial Intelligence · Communication · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

• Oeuvres de Descartes

  René Descartes, Christian Adam et al.•1897

  Incluir item

• Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity

  Robert Merrihew Adams•The Journal of Philosophy•1979

  Incluir item

• Inquiries into Medieval Philosophy

  James S Ross•Inquiries into Medieval Philosophy•1971

  Incluir item

• The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas

  Brian Leftow, Philosophy Documentation Center•International Philosophical…•1991

  Incluir item

• The Problem of Certainty in English Thought 1630–1690

  Open Access•Henry G Leeuwen, Henry G van Leeuwen et al.•Problem of Certainty in English…•1970

  Incluir item

• The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy

  Open Access•Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny et al.•The Cambridge history of later…•1982

  Incluir item

• Identifiable Individuals

  Per Hasle, Peter Øhrstrøm et al.•Papers on time and tense•2003

  Incluir item

• Duns Scotus

  Duns Scotus, Allan Wolter•1963

  Incluir item

• How Things Are

  Open Access•James Bogen, James E McGuire•How Things Are•1985

  Incluir item

• Newton on Matter and Activity

  Robert E Schofield, Ernan Mcmullin•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1979

  Incluir item

• Sameness and Substance

  Helen Morris Cartwright, Daphne Wiggins et al.•The Philosophical Review•1982

  Incluir item

• John Locke

  John W Yolton, Maurice Cranston•The Philosophical Review•1958

  Incluir item

• St. Thomas' Doctrine of Necessary Being

  Patterson Brown•The Philosophical Review•1964

  Incluir item

• Newton on Matter and Activity

  Ralph C S Walker, Ernan Mcmullin•The Philosophical Quarterly•1980

  Incluir item

• Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Philosophical Papers and Letters

  G P Henderson, Leroy E Loemker•The Philosophical Quarterly•1958

  Incluir item

• The Lives of Kant

  Rolf George, Karl Vorlander et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1987

  Incluir item

• The Nature of the Early Royal Society Part II

  Open Access•K Theodore Hoppen•The British Journal for the…•1976

  Incluir item

• "The Origins of Scientific "Law

  Jane E Ruby•Journal of the History of Ideas•1986

  Incluir item

• The Mathematicians' Apprenticeship

  Richard Olson, Mordechai Feingold•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1985

  Incluir item