A New Critical Theory Based on Rational Choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9689271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthias Fritsch (0000-0002-4100-9023, Concordia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 351-362 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300006247 |
| OpenAlex | W1975441658 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
Joseph Heath's Communicative Action and Rational Choice may be read as a critical commentary upon Habermas's critical social theory, but it may also be read as merely using the latter as “scaffolding” (p. 10) for the presentation of Heath's own version of critical theory. In what follows, I will focus on the second option and thus largely ignore the exegetical question to what extent Heath provides a fair reading of Habermas. This does not mean, however, that I will not make comparative judgements. On the contrary, my overall claim will be that Heath's new critical theory is more functionalist, and. partly as a result, less critical than Habermas's. Since lack of space does not permit me to argue this in accordance with the standards of detail that Heath's own book generally observes, my procedure may be justified by the attempt to provoke a clarificatory response from Heath
Action (physics) · Communicative action · Critical reading · Critical theory · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Political science · Presentation (obstetrics) · Reading (process) · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy
Qué pasa con Kansas?
Habermas and Modernity
Communicative Action and Rational Choice
The Ethics of Authenticity
Rational choice as critical theory
The Inclusion of the Other
On the pragmatics of communication
What's the Matter with Kansas
Ideology, Irrationality and Collectively Self-defeating Behavior
Between Facts and Norms
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |