Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Essences and Discovery

Plato, Locke, and Leibniz

Bibliographic Data

ID9689615
AuthorsDouglas Odegard (Memorial University of Newfoundland, corresponding author)
Year1964
Volume3
Issue3
Pages219-234
Publication date1964-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s001221730003537x
OpenAlexW2061600581
LanguageEN

According to Plato's Republic , human knowledge in highest form owes its existence to a priori discoveries made during the course of dialectical investigations. Being a priori , such discoveries are neither empirical observations nor conclusions based upon empirical observations, although in some cases they may be “occasioned” by experience. They are matter for intellectual, not literal, vision, and making them is what distinguishes the successful philosopher from the non-philosopher. Thus, in the Phaedo , Plato is in a position to argue that the separation of the soul from the body in death is no evil for a genuine philosopher: he has no need to rely on the bodily senses in order to acquire philosophical knowledge; and he is well free of the errors and confusion generated by the senses, and of the physical desires nourished in the soul as a result of residing in a body

A priori and a posteriori · Confusion · Dialectic · Epistemology · Literal (mathematical logic) · Order (exchange) · Psychoanalysis · Soul · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophy · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae