Mill's Fallacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9689983 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Avrum Stroll (University of California San Diego, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1965 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 385-404 |
| Publication date | 1965-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300039524 |
| OpenAlex | W1985614931 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
The main part of this paper will begin with a description of the sorts of circumstances in which one may be said to be giving an explanation of something or other. It will then proceed by a series of steps through an account of the role which the giving of reasons has in this process, focussing in particular on the kinds of reasons a person advances when he explains why something is desirable; and this account will again give way (I hope not unnaturally) to a discussion of the logic of the words “evidence” and “proof,” terms which appear crucially in the much-debated matter in moral philosophy of whether it is possible to prove, as the saying goes, “one's ultimate ends.”
Epistemology · Fallacy · Mill · Process (computing) · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Historical and Scientific Studies · History · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |