Choosing and Doing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9690604 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William H Dray (University of Toronto, corresponding author), William Dray |
| Year | 1962 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 129-152 |
| Publication date | 1962-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300037938 |
| OpenAlex | W2152383243 |
| Language | EN |
The question of what is meant by assertions like “He could have done otherwise”, where the truth of what is said is regarded as a necessary condition of holding an agent to be morally responsible for what he has done, has recently been discussed by a number of philosophers. In this paper, I wish to contribute to that discussion, taking note particularly of a commentary by Austin on Moore's and Nowell-Smith's treatment of it, the commentary being found in Austin's British Academy Lecture entitled Ifs and Cans . I shall also consider certain responses to Austin's contentions by Nowell-Smith, D. J. O'Connor and Richard Taylor
Art · Epistemology · Literature · Political science · Wish · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |