Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Formulational vs. Epistemological Debates Concerning Scientific Realism

Bibliographic Data

ID9690762
AuthorsSeungbae Park (0000-0001-5421-9700, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume59
Issue3
Pages479-496
Publication date2020-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0012217320000062
OpenAlexW3002754208
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited25

A formulational debate is a debate over whether certain definitions of scientific realism and antirealism are useful. By contrast, an epistemological debate is a debate over whether we have sufficient evidence for scientific realism and antirealism, defined in a certain manner. I argue that Hilary Putnam's definitions of scientific realism and antirealism are more useful than Bas van Fraassen's definitions of scientific realism and constructive empiricism because Putnam's definitions can generate both formulational and epistemological debates, whereas van Fraassen's can generate only formulational debates

Constructive · Empiricism · Epistemology · Philosophical realism · Process (computing) · Realism · Scientific realism · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Science and Climate Studies

  • The Contextual Theory of Explanation and Inference to the Best Explanation

    Open Access•Seungbae Park•Axiomathes•2022

  • The Indispensability of Mathematics

    Mark Colyvan•The Indispensability of Mathematics•2001

  • Laws and Symmetry

    Bas C Van Fraassen•Laws and Symmetry•1989

  • From a Logical Point of View

    W V Quine, Willard Van Orman Quine•From a logical point of view•1980

  • Exceeding Our Grasp

    Open Access•P Kyle Stanford•Exceeding our grasp•2006

  • A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism

    Jarrett Leplin•A novel defense of scientific…•1997

  • The structure of scientific revolutions

    Dennis Holland, Thomas S Kuhn•La Structure des révolutions…•1976

  • The Problem of Unobserved Anomalies

    Open Access•Seungbae Park•Filosofija. Sociologija•2018

  • Epistemic selectivity, historical threats, and the non-epistemic tenets of scientific realism

    Open Access•Timothy D Lyons•Synthese•2017

  • Understanding the selective realist defence against the PMI

    Open Access•Peter Vickers•Synthese•2017

  • The pessimistic induction and the exponential growth of science reassessed

    Open Access•K Brad Wray•Synthese•2013

  • Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory

    Open Access•Timothy D Lyons•Philosophy of Science•2003

  • Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy

    Open Access•P D Magnus, Craig Callender•Philosophy of Science•2004

  • A Confutation of Convergent Realism

    Open Access•Larry Laudan•Philosophy of Science•1981

  • The scientific image

    Bas C Van Fraassen•The scientific image•1980

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae