The Demand to Repeal the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9692399 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dick Geary (0000-0002-4056-3612, corresponding author), David Geary (0000-0002-7235-8381), Manish Kumar (0000-0002-1444-5508), Manish Kumar Manish Kumar |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 39 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-24 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weekly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-9976 • E-ISSN: 2349-8846 |
| Publisher | Sameeksha Trust (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.71279/epw.v60i39.43761 |
| OpenAlex | W4417486666 |
| Language | EN |
The ongoing hunger strike in Bodh Gaya, initiated on February 12 by Indian Buddhist monks and supporters under the Mahabodhi Mahavihara Mukti Andolan, demands temple management reforms, calling for an end to state interference and the full transfer of control to the Indian Buddhist community. Protesters argue that the Temple Management Act of 1949 upholds Brahmanical dominance over the sacred site, perpetuating historical injustice. While the demands reflect longstanding grievances, they also raise complex questions: Which Buddhist group would oversee the temple? Would Hindu worship be restricted? How do foreign Buddhist organizations and local residents view these calls for reform? A more inclusive governance model, recognizing both Indian Buddhists and the global Buddhist community, could be a significant diplomatic opportunity for India. However, with growing religious and geopolitical stakes, any resolution must be pursued cautiously, ensuring that all stakeholders, including local communities, are considered to maintain peace and preserve Bodh Gaya’s spiritual significance
Buddhism · Dominance (genetics · Geopolitics · Hinduism · Hypocrisy · Repeal · State (computer science · Temple · Worship · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Indian History and Philosophy · South Asian Studies and Conflicts
| Highly cited | No |
|---|