Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Elements of Political Persuasion

Content, Charisma and Cue

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9710092
AutoresTorun Dewan (London School of Economics and Political Science), Michael Humphreys (0000-0001-7029-2326, Columbia University), Macartan Humphreys, Daniel Rubenson (0000-0001-6887-2735, Ryerson University and Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN))
Año2014
Volumen124
Número574
PáginasF257-F292
Fecha de publicación2014-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/ecoj.12112
OpenAlexW2165000691
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas23
Referencias citadas26

Political campaigns employ complex strategies to persuade voters to support them. We analyse the contributions of elements of these strategies using data from a field experiment that randomly assigned canvassers to districts, as well as messaging and endorsement conditions. We find evidence for a strong overall campaign effect and show effects for both message‐based and endorsement‐based campaigns. However, we find little evidence that canvassers varied according to their persuasive ability or that endorser identity matters. Overall the results suggest a surprisingly muted role for idiosyncratic features of prospective persuaders

Advertising · Business · Charisma · Field (mathematics · Identity (music · Persuasion · Persuasive communication · Political advertising · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Does citizen deliberation inside representative institutions enhance legitimacy among non-participating publics?

    Open Access•Adele Webb, Max Grömping et al.•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Durably reducing transphobia

    Open Access•David E Broockman, David Broockman et al.•Science•2016

  • A Source Like Any Other? Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion

    Open Access•Andreas Jungherr, Alexander Wuttke et al.•Journal of Communication•2021

  • Divisive politics

    Open Access•Ifedolapo Ademosu, Aondover Eric Msughter et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2026

  • Emancipatory pedagogies

    Lisa Garcia Bedolla, Andrea Silva•Politics Groups and Identities•2020

  • Information, issues, and supporters

    Open Access•Nigel Jackson•Journal of Public Affairs•2018

  • Leader and villager behavior

    Open Access•Niccolò F Meriggi, Erwin Bulte•World Development•2018

  • Persuasion and gender

    Open Access•Vincenzo Galasso, Tommaso Nannicini•Public Choice•2025

  • What Persuades Voters? A Field Experiment on Political Campaigning

    Open Access•Jared Barton, Marco Castillo et al.•The Economic Journal•2014

  • Votes and Violence

    Open Access•Paul Collier, Pedro C Vicente•The Economic Journal•2014

  • The Variable Persuasiveness of Political Rhetoric

    Open Access•Jack Blumenau, Benjamin E Lauderdale•American Journal of Political…•2024

  • The normalization of intolerance

    Open Access•Risa J Toha, Dimitar D Gueorguiev et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Anticipating Dissent

    Jane Esberg•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Value-added and Transparent Experiments

    Open Access•Peter John Loewen, Daniel Rubenson•Political Studies Review•2022

  • Mini-publics and Public Opinion

    Open Access•Shelley Boulianne•Political Studies•2018

  • Abating Dissonant Public Spheres

    Homero Gil De Zúñiga, Hugo Marcos-Marne et al.•Political Communication•2023

  • Advice Not Taken

    Open Access•Lewis Krashinsky, Christopher H Achen•Political Behavior•2025

  • The Design of Field Experiments With Survey Outcomes

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Joshua L Kalla et al.•Political Analysis•2017

  • Local Candidate Effects in Canadian Elections

    Open Access•Benjamin Allen Stevens, Mujahedul Islam et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2019

  • Policy Deliberation and Voter Persuasion

    Open Access•Gabriel López‐moctezuma, Leonard Wantchekon et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Positive Spillovers from Negative Campaigning

    Open Access•Vincenzo Galasso, Tommaso Nannicini et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Credibility and/or anxiety - The moderators of political information on migration

    Open Access•Sandra N Morgenstern•Social Science Research•2025

  • The Curse of Good Intentions

    Open Access•Nic Cheeseman, Caryn Peiffer•American Political Science Review•2022

  • In Time of War

    Adam J Berinsky•In Time of War•2009

  • Persuasion

    Stefano Dellavigna, Matthew Gentzkow•Annual Review of Economics•2010

  • Media and Political Persuasion

    Ruben Enikolopov, Рубен Ениколопов et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • Phone-Based Gotv—What’s on the Line? Field Experiments with Varied Partisan Components, 2002-2003

    Open Access•John E Mcnulty•The Annals of the American…•2005

  • Things I have learned (so far)

    Jacob Cohen•American Psychologist•1990

  • Attributing Blame

    N Malhotra, Andrew Kuo et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations

    Open Access•Michael Humphreys, Macartan Humphreys et al.•World Politics•2006

  • Clientelism and Voting Behavior

    Open Access•Leonard Wantchekon•World Politics•2003

  • Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, William G Howell et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Competing Rhetoric Over Time

    James N Druckman, Cari Lynn Hennessy et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Partisan and Nonpartisan Message Content and Voter Mobilization

    Open Access•Costas Panagopoulos•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Presidential prototypes

    Open Access•Donald R Kinder, Mark D Peters et al.•Political Behavior•1980

  • Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux•Political Behavior•2008

  • Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World

    Pamela Johnston Conover, Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Educating the Least Informed

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Robin Kolodny•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates

    Wendy M Rahn•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Experimental Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Related to Self-Selection

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Comparing Negative and Positive Campaign Messages

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, David W Nickerson•American Politics Research•2010

  • Testing the power of arguments in referendums

    Open Access•Peter John Loewen, Daniel Rubenson et al.•Electoral Studies•2012

  • Social Pressure and Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green et al.•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Leading the Party

    Open Access•Torun Dewan, David P Myatt•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate

    Open Access•John G Bullock•American Political Science Review•2011

  • The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green•American Political Science Review•2000

Obras citantes distintas23
Citas por año1,92
Intervalo de citas2014 - 2026 (13)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 22
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae