Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hitler’s Judges

Ideological Commitment and the Death Penalty in Nazi Germany

Bibliographic Data

ID9714669
AuthorsWayne Geerling (0000-0002-8312-2147, University of Arizona), Gary Β Magee (0000-0002-2793-8790, IIE MSA), Gary Magee (Monash University and University of Johannesburg), Vinod Mishra (0000-0002-4686-5195, Monash University), Russell Smyth (0000-0001-6593-5462, Monash University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume128
Issue614
Pages2414-2449
Publication date2018-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/ecoj.12497
OpenAlexW2589990310
LanguageEN
References cited38

We examine the role of judicial policy preferences in influencing whether judges in Nazi Germany sentenced defendants charged with serious political offences to death. We find that judicial policy preferences, measured by the depth of the ideological commitment of the judge to the Nazi Party worldview, were an important determinant of whether judges imposed the death sentence. Judges more committed to the Nazi Party were more likely to impose the death sentence on defendants belonging to organised political opposition groups, those accused of violent resistance and those with characteristics to which Nazism was intolerant

Criminology · Ideology · Nazism · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Sentence · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Die Urteilspraxis des nationalsozialistischen Volksgerichtshofs

    Holger Schlüter•Die Urteilspraxis des nationalsozia…•1995

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes

    Juan J Linz•Totalitarian and Authoritarian…•2000

  • Der Volksgerichtshof und sein Beobachter

    Open Access•Edmund Lauf•Volksgerichtshof und Sein…•1994

  • Weimar Germany

    Eric D Weitz, Eric Weitz•Weimar Germany•2018

  • Der Volksgerichtshof im nationalsozialistischen Staat

    Walter Wagner, Jürgen Zarusky•Volksgerichtshof Im Nationalsoziali…•2011

  • The Nazi Dictatorship

    Ian Kershaw•The Nazi Dictatorship•2015

  • Authoritarian Rule of Law

    Open Access•Jothie Rajah•Authoritarian Rule of Law•2012

  • Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing

    David B Mustard•The Journal of Law and Economics•2001

  • The Struggle for Constitutional Power

    Open Access•Tamir Moustafa•Struggle for Constitutional Power•2007

  • In the Name of the Volk

    Ronald Smelser, Heidemarie Koch et al.•German Studies Review•1990

  • Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes

    Tamir Moustafa•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Did Legal Positivism Render German Jurists Defenceless During the Third Reich

    Open Access•Walter Ott, Franziska Buob•Social & Legal Studies•1993

  • Toward a Process Model of Identity Formation

    Open Access•Harold D Grotevant•Journal of Adolescent Research•1987

  • Weimar Germany. Promise and Tragedy

    Matthew Stibbe•German History•2009

  • Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime

    Open Access•José J Toharia•Law & Society Review•1975

  • Sentencing, Judicial Discretion, and Political Prisoners in Pre-War Nazi Germany

    Wayne Geerling, Gary B Magee et al.•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae