Trade – A Catalyst for Peace

The trade regime agreed in the Paris Protocol was determined by political rather than economic considerations. It failed to create a level playing‐field between Israeli and Palestinian producers, because of Israeli non‐tariff barriers and the lack of provision for external arbitration of disputes between parties with unequal powers. The novel element in the agreement of the three lists of specified goods generated uncertainties and conflicts, as well as some side benefits for the Palestinian Authority. The arrangements for the clearance of import and other taxes to the PA were complex and conflict‐generating. Recommendations are made for improvements in future agreements

Arbitration · Business · Economics · Element (criminal law · Field (mathematics · International economics · International trade · Law and economics · Level playing field · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Tariff · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Global trade and economics · Law

• The Palestinian Authority Political Economy

  Open Access•Anas Iqtait•Political Economy of Palestine•2021

  Incluir item

• Gramsci, political economy, and the decline of the peace process

  Markus E Bouillon•Critique Critical Middle Eastern…•2004

  Incluir item

• Taxation during State Formation

  Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Odd‐Helge Fjeldstad et al.•Forum for Development Studies•2004

  Incluir item

• Revisiting the Paris Protocol

  Mohammed Samhouri•The Middle East Journal•2016

  Incluir item

• Power and Trade

  Sharif S Elmusa, Mahmud El-Jaafari•Journal of Palestine Studies•1995

  Incluir item