The Transport Bias in Comparisons of National Income
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9722185 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dan Usher (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1963 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 118 |
| Pages | 140 |
| Publication date | 1963-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2601458 |
| OpenAlex | W2312681050 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
It is generally recognized that the usual method of comparing national income-conversion by the foreign exchange rate into U.S. dollars (or other common currency) per capita-exaggerates differences in living standards between rich and poor countries. This recognition has led many authors to make comparisons of national income at a uniform set of prices. The major landmarks are the work of Colin Clark,2 Kuznets,3 and Gilbert and Kravis.4 The results of different systems of international comparison may vary so materially as to swamp differences merely due to deficiencies in the basic statistical data. For example, the conventional comparison shows that the per capita national income of the United Kingdom is about fourteen times that of Thailand. Recomputations made by the author to allow for various biases in the comparison suggest that the effective ratio of living standards is about three to one.5 Even if the recomputed ratio is doubled, the change in order of magnitude is large enough to affect our way of thinking about the underdeveloped countries. It is less well known why this exaggeration of income differentials takes place. Income is quantity multiplied by price; fundamentally there can only be two sorts of reasons, those associated with the quantities of goods compared and those associated with the operation of the price mechanism. The theory of the comparison of quantities has been examined exhaustively by Kuznets. Most of the difficulties boil down to the decisions as to what constitutes income, and as to the distinction between cost of production and income. The rule in ordinary national income accounting is that all expenditures by final consumers together with govemment expenditures and investment are income, and that all other expenditures are costs of production. Some rule like this is
Currency · Economics · Exaggeration · Macroeconomics · Measures of national income and output · Order (exchange) · Per capita · Per capita income · Population · Standard of living · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · Global trade and economics · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Population and Savings
Food Needs and Work Capacity
Land, Labour, Savings, and Credit
Real National Income as a Measure of General Well‐Being
Uncertainty, Insurance, and Social Norms
The Realization of Well‐Being
Food, Care, and Work
Adaptation to Undernourishment
Classical Utilitarianism in a Limited World
Households and Credit Restraints
Axiomatic Bargaining Theory
Poverty and the Environmental Resource Base
The Objects of Social Contracts
The Commodity Basis of Well‐Being
Well‐Being
Incentives and Development Policies
Analysis of Allocation Mechanisms When Nutrition Affects Productivity
Resource Allocation Mechanisms
Public Goods and Common‐Property Resources
Decentralization and Central Guidance
Net National Product in a Dynamic Economy
Political Morality and the State
Inequality, Malnutrition, and the Disfranchised
Fertility and Resources
Strategic Complementarities in Fertility Decisions
An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution
The Internationalization of Global Labor Markets
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,69 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 1995 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 27 |