Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Economic Concept of a Public Utility

Bibliographic Data

ID9722204
AuthorsHarold E Batson (corresponding author)
Year1933
Issue42
Pages457
Publication date1933-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2548908
OpenAlexW2334509636
LanguageEN
Citations received1

SOME justification may seem to be needed for my choice of a subject for this paper, since the term public in the strictest sense cannot be considered to refer to an economic concept at all. Primarily, a public is whatever is defined as such by American statute law. The case for a concept of this kind cannot be adjudicated by economists. But the term public utility is not restricted to this legal meaning. We meet it in official papers referring to English industries,2 in which context the declarations of American law are obviously irrelevant. Behind the legislative concept of public utilities lies in fact a political concept, which may be defined as the idea that certain industries need special Government regulation. Even in America, an industry miglht be a public in this sense without being a public in law. But this political concept is in its turn based upon the idea that there are certain industries in which the ordinary restrictions of individualism are insufficient to ensure the appearance of satisfactorily individualistic results. Thus one term is forced to do duty for three related but quite distinct concepts. When the law of Illinois says that the owner of any property within the State used for the production of electricity is a public utility, it is using the term in the fifst of these senses. When the English Labour Party says that the iron and steel industries ought to be reorganised as public utilities,3 it is using the term in the second or political sense. And when Professor Glaeser says, the world over, public utilities are now considered a thing apart from other commercial enterprises,4 he seems to be using the term in the third or economic sense. It is with the economic concept of public utilities that we are con1 This paper was read, practically in its present form, at a meeting of the Economic Club on February gth, I932. 2 E.g., The Board of Trade Jouynal Supplement, October 6th, 1927. 3 Election Programme, October 1931. 4 Outlines of Public Utility Economics, 1927, p. 4

Context (archaeology) · Duty · Economics · Government (linguistics) · Individualism · Law and economics · Legislature · Meaning (existential) · Original meaning · Political science · Politics · State (computer science) · Statute · Term (time) · Economic and Fiscal Studies · European Monetary and Fiscal Policies · Law · Taxation and Legal Issues

  • Regulation and the redistribution of income and wealth

    Open Access•W T Stanbury, George Lermer•Canadian Public Administration•1983

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,02
Citation span1983 - 1983 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae