Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Non-Binary Social Choice

Revealed Preferential Interpretation

Bibliographic Data

ID9724912
AuthorsYasumi Matsumoto (corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume52
Issue206
Pages185
Publication date1985-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2554419
OpenAlexW1992169340
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

In this paper, the framework of social choice theory is transformed in terms of the revealed preference relation. The reader may realize that this transformation relaxes the traditional framework without essentially changing Arrow's (1963) original requirements and that his General Possibility Theorem (GPT) and the related results so far achieved still hold. The introduction of the revealed preference is motivated by a traditional narrow interpretation of Arrow into a choice functional framework in which the base relation is used. The base relation pays attention to choices over pairs only, and all the choices from the set of larger-than-pairs are actually given no role in the analysis. However, because of its binary relational structure (see Sen, 1977), Arrow's original framework is appropriate for any size of subsets of alternatives, not only for pairs, and it does not necessarily require the choice based on all non-empty subsets of the set of all alternatives. If we are seriously to consider the generality of his General Possibility Theorem, Arrow's framework has to be transformed so as to satisfy the above points. This can be done by introducing the revealed preference relation. The motivation of the revealed preference originally comes from the realization that it is almost impossible to get complete information in an actual case and that only some preferences are revealed (Samuelson, 1938). Thus, it is obvious that the revealed preference is based on the imperfection of information for preferences and need not be induced from pairwise comparisons only

Arrow · Base (topology) · Binary relation · Data mining · Discrete mathematics · Econometrics · Economics · Generality · Interpretation (philosophy) · Mathematical economics · Pairwise comparison · Preference · Preference relation · Realization (probability) · Relation (database) · Revealed preference · Set (abstract data type) · Social choice theory · Statistics · Transformation (genetics) · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Mathematics

  • The Possibility of Social Choice

    Amartya Sen•American Economic Review•1999

  • Social Choice Theory

    Amartya Sen•Econometrica•1977

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    Kenneth J Arrow, Eric S Maskin•Social Choice and Individual Values•2017

  • Conditions on social choice functions

    Open Access•Jeffrey T Richelson, Jeffrey Richelson•Public Choice•1977

  • A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour

    Paul A Samuelson•Economica•1938

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,04
Citation span1999 - 1999 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae