Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

State-by-State Comparisons of Achievement

Suggestions for Enhancing Validity

Bibliographic Data

ID9730816
AuthorsRobert L Linn (corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume17
Issue3
Pages6
Publication date1988-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Researcher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1174827
OpenAlexW2008442619
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

In its recent deliberations about the bill to reauthorize federal elementary and secondary education programs, the Senate added an amendment that calls for a substantial expansion and reshaping of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). A critical aspect of the expansion is the of sampling techniques that produce data that are representative on a national, regional and State basis (H 5 EAS, sec. 9002). The provision for state level data is a significant departure from past practice, but is in keeping with the recommendations from the Department of Education that were buttressed by the report of a blueribbon panel that was constituted to review NAEP and make recommendations about its future (Alexander-James, 1987). It is also consistent with positions taken in recent years by the Council of Chief State School Officers. Although the fate of the amendment depends on actions that at the time of this writing are yet to be taken by the Senate and House Conference on the bill, the push for stateby-state comparisons is very strong and seems to face relatively little resistance. In any event, many of the issues parallel those that arise in the increasingly widespread use of test data to compare districts within a state or schools within a district

Academic achievement · Developmental psychology · Educational research · Mathematics education · Psychometrics · State (computer science · Test validity · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · School Choice and Performance

  • Mandated competency testing programs

    Douglas R Glasnapp, John P Poggio•Theory Into Practice•1991

  • Differential Content Validity

    Open Access•Kenneth D Hopkins, Carolyn J Wilkerson•Educational and Psychological…•1965

  • Test validity and the ethics of assessment

    Samuel Messick•American Psychologist•1980

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,03
Citation span1991 - 1991 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae