Rees
A Registry of Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies in Education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9735175 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dustin Anderson (Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, corresponding author), Jessaca Spybrook (0000-0003-1768-6187, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI), Rebecca Maynard (0000-0003-0014-3477, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-50 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x18810513 |
| OpenAlex | W2899520723 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 21 |
Calls for improving transparency across the social science are increasing. One strategy that is gaining momentum in the quest to increase transparency is the practice of preregistering a study and analysis plan prior to conducting a study. In this article, we examine the potential of preregistration as a strategy for increasing transparency in education studies. We review existing registries within the social sciences and provide a rationale for why we need a registry specifically geared towards education studies. Finally, we introduce the Registry of Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies (REES), developed by the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE). The goal of REES is to increase transparency for studies seeking to draw causal conclusions within the education research and evaluation community
Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Transparency (behavior · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Medicine · Psychology · School Choice and Performance
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
Publication bias in the social sciences
P-curve
Reshaping Institutions
Scientific Utopia
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Harking
Outcome-Reporting Bias in Education Research
Antifragile
Transparency, Replication, and Cumulative Learning
Publication Bias in Two Political Behavior Literatures
Promises and Perils of Pre-Analysis Plans
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |