Democratizing the Development of Evidence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9735226 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cara Jackson (0000-0003-3504-8015, Abt Associates, Rockville, MD, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 209-215 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x211060357 |
| OpenAlex | W3215179584 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 27 |
This essay offers a framework for broader community involvement as a means of increasing the relevance and usefulness of evidence developed. This essay begins by defining key concepts related to democratizing the development of evidence. The sections that follow outline a logic model that calls for a bidirectional, iterative set of core activities to draw on insights from practitioners, community stakeholders, and researchers to generate a learning agenda, analysis plans, and findings that can be used to develop or refine policies and practices. The essay concludes with implications for advocates of democratizing the development of evidence and for researchers
Engineering ethics · Evidence-based practice · Key (lock · Political science · Public relations · Relevance (law · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science
Complex adaptive interventions
Nilai Tradisi Nyepi Di Bali
Using Predictive Analytics to Allocate Educational Resources
A realist review of dyslexia pilot project research
The evolution of systematic evidence reviews
Teacher‐composed cases of practice as and for dissemination, reflection and data
Unpacking core components for policy design
Knowledge Exchange Processes in Organizations and Policy Arenas: A Narrative Systematic Review of the Literature
Evidence, Interpretation, and Persuasion
Confirmation Bias
Status quo bias in decision making
Research Worth Using
Commentary
Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion
State Education Agencies’ Acquisition and Use of Research Knowledge for School Improvement
Brokering the Research–Practice Gap
The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies
Reinventing the Role of the University Researcher
What Good Is Polarizing Research Into Qualitative and Quantitative
Rethinking Connections Between Research and Practice in Education
Toward a Framework for Public Accountability in Education Reform
Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions
Does the Meeting Style Matter? The Effects of Exposure to Participatory and Deliberative School Board Meetings
How Do Politicians Attribute Bureaucratic Responsibility for Performance? Negativity Bias and Interest Group Advocacy
| Citations per year | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |