Imagining Roman Britain
Victorian Responses to a Roman Past
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9736820 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Norman Vance (0000-0001-7843-1562, University of Sussex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 125 |
| Issue | 512 |
| Pages | 212-213 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cep369 |
| OpenAlex | W2010313082 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
This is a useful and competent study of archaeological engagement with Roman remains in Victorian Britain. It draws on the personal letters and papers of individual antiquarians, the accessions list, minute-books and correspondence files of local archaeological bodies, and a range of archaeological journals and publications, to explore how one society engaged with another. As Dr Hoselitz observes, there is at least as much to discover about class-ridden Victorian society as about Roman settlement from this conjunction. The enquiry is prefaced by survey-chapters which range across the country from Silchester to Hadrian's Wall, touching on literary and visual representations, social issues (‘Gentlemen and scientists’) and the politics of colonisation and national identity. But it is mainly concerned with four sites of exploration in the 1840s and 1850s, in Caerleon, Cirencester, Colchester and Chester. Such drastic selectivity is perhaps unavoidable as a way of controlling an unruly mass of evidence. For the best results, historians of archaeology, like archaeologists themselves, need to start in the right place, clear the site of extraneous matter and isolate and identify the specific objects of enquiry. Then they face the additional challenge of incorporating evidence from individual finds and scattered sites into some more general picture. As Hoselitz shows us in relation to Colchester, Roman remains were often used as a basis for subsequent, particularly Norman and medieval, building: it took some time for it to be established that, while Colchester Castle is an essentially Norman keep, it rests on what was originally the plinth of the Roman Temple of Claudius
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Face (sociological concept · Identity (music · Politics · Relation (database · Settlement (finance · Social science · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Law
The dominion of history
Early Studies in Roman Britain
Early Studies in Roman Britain
Imagining the Ancient Britons
Musical performance informed by history and vice versa
Beyond Empire
The British Empire
A Victorian Invention? Thomas Thornycroft's ‘Boadicea Group’ and the Idea of Historical Culture in Britain
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,57 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2020 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |