Mary and Philip
The Marriage of Tudor England and Habsburg Spain, by Alexander Samson
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9737225 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gonzalo Velasco Berenguer (0000-0003-4309-9250, University of Bristol, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 137 |
| Issue | 589 |
| Pages | 1827-1829 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/ceab282 |
| OpenAlex | W3210503536 |
| Language | EN |
The reign of Mary I (1553–8) and Philip (1554–8) has been vilified and dismissed as irrelevant for centuries. The queen was typically recast as a ‘bloody remaniac’ avant la lettre—to use Alexander Samson’s humorous expression—by those who understood the English Reformation ‘as a movement of national liberation’ (p. 222). In consequence, the reign, the reconciliation with Rome and the project of co-monarchy with Philip of Spain were traditionally perceived to have been essentially un-English and a mere glitch in the kingdom’s path towards Protestantism. Samson’s work is the latest in a series of studies which are bringing nuance to the historical narratives on Mary and Philip by making an effort to study their reign in its own terms, rather than through a particular national or religious lens. Samson begins by setting the context, analysing Mary’s contested accession against the claims of Lady Jane Grey and the importance of Mary’s Catholicism as a source of popularity, as well as the crucial commercial links between England, Flanders and Castile which were the backbone of the Anglo-Spanish match. This prepares the scene for understanding the marriage contract. Samson dissects with surgical precision the mechanisms set in motion to draw up a marriage treaty that would be advantageous to both monarchs, even if some of the clauses could be seen as detrimental by Philip. There follows a survey of the rebellion of 1554 by Sir Thomas Wyatt and others. Although they had ostensibly risen to prevent the Spanish marriage, Samson convincingly argues that, even if anti-Spanish propaganda was strong, it cannot be assumed from the surviving evidence that the rebels’ anti-Spanish sentiments were widely held. The gendered questions surrounding female rule raised by the rebellion are also addressed in this chapter through a fascinating exploration of the Act for the Queen’s Regal Power (1554) which proclaimed Mary’s power, authority and prerogatives to be equal to those of any of her male predecessors
Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Context (archaeology · English Reformation · Literature · Monarchy · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · Queen (butterfly · Reign · Scots · Throne · Classics · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Law · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Scottish History and National Identity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |