The Return of the ‘Deade Alive’
The Earl of Bristol and Dr Eglisham in the Parliament of 1626 and in Caroline Political Culture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9738757 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Cogswell (University of California, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue | 532 |
| Pages | 535-570 |
| Publication date | 2013-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cet057 |
| OpenAlex | W2312371493 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Previous scholars of parliamentary history and political culture in the early seventeenth century have only paid scant attention to the earl of Bristol’s role in the 1626 Parliament and none at all to that of George Eglisham. Yet they played a dramatic role in the session. They blackened the reputation of the duke of Buckingham and even besmirched the young king. Indeed Eglisham’s accusation did more than merely follow Charles I to the grave; it helped put him there
Art history · Buckingham · False accusation · George (robot · Parliament · Political culture · Political science · Politics · Reputation · Classics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Scottish History and National Identity
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |