Henry of Lancaster’s Revolt (1328–29)
Conflict, the Politics of Kingship, and the Political Public in Fourteenth-Century England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9738796 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melissa Raven (0000-0001-6181-0072, University of Nottingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 138 |
| Issue | 593 |
| Pages | 705-743 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cead153 |
| OpenAlex | W4388792994 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
The late medieval period was an important phase in the history of political communication in England, as more people than ever before became involved in debates about royal governance. The first half of the fourteenth century, however, has been relatively under-studied in this regard. This article analyses a set of arguments put forward during a revolt led by Henry, earl of Lancaster, in 1328–29. After outlining the revolt’s historical and historiographical context, the article reveals how three key themes—the provision of advice; the moral responsibilities attached to royal finance; and the state of the king’s peace—were contested in 1328–29. It then turns to the public orientation of these arguments to suggest that this contest reveals a growing need to engage a political public in order to acquire legitimacy when seeking to reform, or to defend, the direction of royal government. In turn, this helped to set out what the most legitimate paths of political action were and what terms needed to be taken up to describe them by those who wished to involve themselves in the politics of kingship. It is argued that Lancaster’s revolt held a significant position in a much broader history of political communication in England, in which political legitimacy in the exercise of royal authority was claimed before, evaluated by, and generated through a critical body of public opinion which interacted with Plantagenet rule
CONTEST · Context (archaeology · Historiography · Legitimacy · Monarchy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |