Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Uncivil Mirth

Ridicule in Enlightenment Britain, by Ross Carroll

Bibliographic Data

ID9739272
AuthorsKate Davison (0000-0002-4170-6734, University of Sheffield, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume137
Issue587
Pages1264-1266
Publication date2022-12-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/ceac136
OpenAlexW4283783817
LanguageEN

Historians have long been interested in the laughter of the past: the subjects that people saw fit to laugh at can provide a window into historical cultures like no other. In recent years, however, there has been growing attention to the act of laughing itself, how it has been understood in the past, and what its effects might have been. Ross Carroll’s book follows this line of inquiry, exploring debates in eighteenth-century Britain about the practice of ridicule, that is, the uses and abuses of laughing at something or someone. The focus is at the level of intellectual and philosophical debate, as Carroll mines the writings—published and unpublished—of some of the period’s leading thinkers, beginning with the third earl of Shaftesbury and concluding with Mary Wollstonecraft. This is particularly fertile ground: as Carroll argues, the eighteenth century ‘saw philosophical scrutiny of the subject rise to a pitch and intensity rarely matched before or since’ (p. 2). Time and again, ridicule was celebrated as a tool of critique and inquiry, though it never entirely shook its latent potential to foster contempt and fractiousness. None of those who advocated the use of ridicule did so without reservation and ambivalence is a theme throughout. As the introductory chapter makes clear, Carroll is writing for political theorists: he casts the book as ‘an exercise in historical recovery’ (p. 19), which is intended to shed light on present-day concerns about civility (or lack of) in public debate and the effects of reaching for ridicule in this context. Yet, there is plenty here, too, for those whose primary concern is historical, and especially those whose interests lie in eighteenth-century Britain. Carroll makes a convincing case that this ‘Age of Reason’ was also an ‘Age of Ridicule’ in which laughter was a prominent part of enlightenment intellectual culture

Aesthetics · Ambivalence · Art · Civility · Contempt · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Ideology · Laughter · Literature · Period (music · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Scrutiny · Sociology · Subject (documents · Theme (computing · History · Humor Studies and Applications · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae