Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The English Civil War

Conflict and Contexts, 1640-49, ed. John Adamson

Bibliographic Data

ID9740258
AuthorsGeoffrey Smith (0000-0001-5700-8810, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume126
Issue520
Pages694-695
Publication date2011-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/cer086
OpenAlexW2333111918
LanguageEN

The title could mislead some people, for this book goes far beyond being just another collection of essays on the English Civil War, or whatever these days we choose to call the series of convulsions that distracted the three Stuart kingdoms for twenty years. For this is a challenging and important book that makes a number of valuable contributions to our understanding of that complex but perennially favourite subject. Both John Adamson's introduction and the different essays support the editor's claim for ‘the subject's vitality and enduring power to fascinate’. The introduction is particularly valuable, as it presents a lucid and incisive survey of the whole complex historiography of the Civil War. Beginning with a consideration of the extraordinarily impressive achievement of S.R. Gardiner, working at the high tide of Gladstonian and Victorian Liberalism, Adamson traces the once dominant interpretations and influences of Gardiner, Weber, Marx, Tawney, Hill and others, continuing his survey down to the current fluid state of a wide-ranging and sometimes controversial reconfiguring of issues and debates by a new generation of historians. For long periods, certain favoured groups—the godly but also bourgeois capitalist Puritans, the gentry (whether rising or falling), the ‘county communities’, the House of Commons, the radical Levellers and Diggers—basked in the spotlight of historical interest, while other key players in the conflict, notably the royal court, the nobility and the royalists, languished in outer darkness, in what the editor calls ‘a scholarly No Man's Land’. Viewed as standing in opposition to the progressive march of history, they may have enjoyed some colourful or romantic appeal, but they were essentially inconsequential, not deserving of the attention of serious historians

Archaeology · Art history · Bourgeoisie · Gentry · Historiography · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Spanish Civil War · Subject (documents · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Australian History and Society · Classics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae