Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agrarian Capitalism and Poor Relief in England, 1500-1860

Bibliographic Data

ID9741094
AuthorsJonathan Healey (0000-0002-1221-3172, St. John's College, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume125
Issue514
Pages705-707
Publication date2010-05-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/ceq092
OpenAlexW2018168930
LanguageEN

‘It is striking’, the author of this short and argumentative book tells us, ‘that a profound recasting of class relations, one that left most people bereft of property as well as control over their lives, occurred without inducing a protracted and violent revolution’ (p. 203). This profound recasting was England's transition from feudalism to agrarian capitalism—a longstanding cornerstone of Marxist history—and the explanation offered here for its peaceable nature is the unique social-welfare provision offered by the English Poor Laws. Indeed, rather than seeing welfare spending as inimical, or at least in fundamental opposition, to capitalism, the author sees it as a necessary precondition, smoothing the transition to the market economy by curbing the worst effects of the competitive society. The argument is based on the author's secondary reading and is heavily theoretical in approach, aiming to locate the development of English social policy within an avowedly Marxist framework, albeit one that draws as much inspiration from the work of Robert Brenner as from Marx himself. The book is unabashedly teleological, aiming to trace the ‘origins of the welfare state’, which developed out of the early modern English experience (the author argues, reasonably) more than that of nineteenth-century Germany. There is also a hint of present-centredness, with the final section incorporating a stinging critique of the welfare policies of the Clinton administration of the 1990s. Despite the anglocentrism of the title the scope is refreshingly broad, covering some five centuries and five different countries (England, Scotland, Ireland, France and Germany—especially Prussia), and the comparative dimension is prominent through much of the book. Thus, the author can see the precocious adoption of social-welfare programmes by the English state (most notably the Tudor Poor Laws) as a function of the country's early departure on the path to agrarian capitalism. By contrast, in Scotland, Ireland, France and Germany such developments had to wait until the nineteenth century, at which time these countries too began formulating national strategies for welfare provision. Access to land is seen as critical: in England a landless proletariat developed early on, whereas elsewhere a landholding peasantry survived until much later

Agrarian society · Capitalism · Economics · Economy · Feudalism · Marxist philosophy · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Welfare state · History · Law · Political Economy and Marxism

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae