Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Debate over British Reparations for Mandate-Era Governance of Palestine? Three views

Bibliographic Data

ID9744305
AuthorsJohn Quigley (0000-0001-5623-8278, The Ohio State University), John B Quigley (The Ohio State University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume54
Issue3
Pages1-10
Publication date2026-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-6534 • E-ISSN: 1743-9329
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03086534.2025.2607609
OpenAlexW7117977677
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

As reparations are being demanded from more former colonial powers, Britain is in the crosshairs for Palestine, given the century-long conflict that has resulted. According to the view most commonly found in historical and legal literature, no reparation is required, because Britain acted in accordance with decisions made by the League of Nations. According to two more recently expressed views, reparation is in order. By the first of these, Britain is said to have acted indeed under League decisions, except for implementation of the Balfour Declaration, which, it is said, violated the League’s Covenant, hence was unlawful even though endorsed by the League. According to a third view, reparation is in order because the entire British project in Palestine rested on faulty institutional and legal premises. A state seeking to hold a mandate had first to acquire title to the relevant territory from the existing sovereign, which in the case of Palestine was Turkey. Britain never gained title from Turkey, hence never gained a mandate. Britain’s administration of Palestine deprived the population of self-rule and left it open to the mass expulsion it suffered in 1948. As a result, reparation is in order.

Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Perspective (graphical · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Middle East Politics and Society

  • From Partnership to Revolt

    Open Access•Amir Goldstein, Elad Nahshon•The Journal of Imperial &…•2026

  • Britain and Its Mandate over Palestine

    John Quigley•Britain's Mandate in Palestine•2022

  • Tears of the Olive Trees

    Open Access•Ralph Wilde•Journal of the History of…•2022

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae