A contrastive study of hedging in English and Chinese academic spoken discourse

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9744635
AutoresYuxiang Duan (0000-0003-4319-7627, North University of China, autor correspondente), Liesbeth Degand (0000-0003-1062-9243, UCLouvain)
Ano2025
Data de publicação2025-08-18
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1018-2101 • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
EditoraJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/prag.24019.dua
OpenAlexW4413279976
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas43

This study sets out to discuss the distribution and linguistic features of hedging strategy, investigating how they are realized in L1 English, English as a lingua franca (ELF), and L1 Chinese within the academic spoken genre. To this end, a systematic procedure for identifying hedging devices was developed, applied to two languages and an international variety. Results indicate functional diversity in hedging conventions, with L1 English exhibiting a colloquial propensity compared to ELF and L1 Mandarin. Conversely, ELF speakers display the highest frequency of hedges but with less diversity. L1 Mandarin speakers show a preference for author-oriented hedges, while L1 English speakers favor audience-oriented ones. The findings are interpreted considering language differences, linguacultural practice, cognitive interpretations, and socio-pragmatic awareness within academic communities. The study also contributes to further discourse analysis and scholarly peer communication by highlighting the importance of hedging in usage-based research

Contrastive analysis · Linguistics · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Philosophy · Psychology