Necesitamos bases filosóficas y epistemológicas para la investigación con Métodos Combinados
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9744725 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ignacio Pardo Rodríguez (Universidad de la República de Uruguay, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 0 |
| Issue | 22 |
| Pages | 91 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1139-5737 • E-ISSN: 2174-0682 |
| Publisher | UNED - Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5944/empiria.22.2011.86 |
| OpenAlex | W2104026169 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 4 |
In the last decade, Mixed – Methods approach was developed, surrounded by agrowing community of mixed researchers. Those contrary to the integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches seem to have lost the debate on the incompatibility thesis, which lasted for several decades. But Mixed – Methods research still lacks several important definitions. One of them, the philosophy and epistemology underlying this research strategy. Several options are discussed in this paper. The most frequent philosophical basis is pragmatism, but other choices can be considered as well. Nonetheless, the key question raised is if we inevitably need to establish rigid philosophical basis. It may be inevitable to hold a philosophical point of view, but at the same time the practice of research could benefit from flexible relationship between abstract assumptions and practical research decisions
Epistemology · Pragmatism · Sociology · Computer Science · Education and Art Integration · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2020 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |