Transnational Corporate Responsibility in Domestic Courts
Still Out of Reach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9745269 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Sanger (0000-0002-6718-2959, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Pages | 4-9 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aju.2018.95 |
| OpenAlex | W2910225479 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Despite some modest progress, corporate responsibility for human rights abuses in domestic courts remains elusive. In U.S. federal courts, Alien Tort Statute (ATS) litigation is now more precarious than ever before. While there have been some potentially important developments in English courts, judges are reluctant to extend responsibility to parent corporations for harm caused by the operations of foreign subsidiaries. Although U.S. and English courts have been concerned with distinct doctrinal issues, the overall picture appears to be one of deference to the corporation and its anatomized form, and to the goal of promoting investment abroad
Alien Tort Statute · Business · Corporation · Deference · Harm · Human rights · Law and economics · Liability · Multinational corporation · Political science · Sociology · Statute · Subsidiary · Tort · Corporate Law and Human Rights · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |