Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contrasting Educational Strategies in Health Sciences vs. Non-Health Sciences Disciplines

Insights from Scopus Database

Bibliographic Data

ID9745413
AuthorsDaniel Silva (0000-0002-9897-9805, Universidad César Vallejo), Arthur Serrato-Cherres (0000-0003-3525-6607, Universidad César Vallejo), Judith Marita Soplin Rojas (0000-0003-1242-9974, Universidad César Vallejo), Arturo César Pomacaja Flores (0009-0002-2802-9377, Universidad César Vallejo), Pamela Jennifer Sullca Tapia (0000-0001-6499-5949, Universidad César Vallejo)
Year2023
Volume3
Pages439
Publication date2023-06-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSalud, Ciencia y Tecnología (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2796-9711
PublisherAG Editor (Argentina) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.56294/saludcyt2023439
OpenAlexW4381662480
LanguageEN
References cited14

Introduction: education plays a pivotal role in shaping the knowledge, skills, and competencies of individuals across various fields of study.Objective: to contrast educational strategies used in health sciences with those employed in disciplines unrelated to health.Methods: the present study is primarily based on primary literature, mostly academic articles, indexed in the Scopus database. The aim of using this method is to quantify the documents referring to bibliometric analysis as a working tool in two categories for subsequent analysis: non-health-related categories (NH) and health-related categories (H). The groups were examined separately with a productivity and citation analysis to assess their impact.Results: during this period, there is a gradual increase in the number of documents in both groups. In the NH group, the number of documents increased from 907 in 2013 to 2422 in 2022. Meanwhile, in the H group, the number of documents increased from 192 in 2013 to 490 in 2022. Overall, there is an increase in the number of documents in both groups over time, with the NH group exhibiting a higher number of documents compared to the H group in each year. it is observed that both groups have a low level of international collaboration, although the NH group shows a slightly higher proportion. On the other hand, the H group exhibits a higher proportion of national collaboration and a lower lack of collaboration compared to the NH group. Both groups demonstrate a high level of institutional collaboration. A greater heterogeneity is observed in areas other than health.Conclusions: this study has provided an integrated view of research in health-related and non-health-related categories. The results emphasize the importance of promoting international collaboration and strengthening collaboration networks in both groups. Furthermore, key thematic areas in the field of nursing education, healthcare and clinical practice, human behavior and psychology, and teaching and learning have been identified. These findings can be useful for researchers, educators, and healthcare professionals interested in addressing these topics in the context of training and clinical practice, as well as for those seeking to understand current trends and interrelationships in the field of education

Humanities · Health and Medical Education · Knowledge Management in Higher Education · Philosophy · Scientific Research and Technology

  • On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – a review of literature

    Open Access•Fanny Pettersson•Education and Information…•2018

  • The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production

    Open Access•Ole Ellegaard, Jason Wallin et al.•Scientometrics•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae