The Myth of Cost-Free Jurisdictional Reallocation

The recent trend to make federal crimes of essentially local criminal activity involving violence or drugs reflects the competing pressures on Congress and the president to maintain fiscal austerity while responding to public concerns that administration of the criminal law by state courts is ineffective. This trend has been encouraged by the myth that the federalization of crime is essentially cost free. In reality, this trend threatens serious harm to the ability of federal courts to perform their core functions, and to the ability of federal judges to discharge their duties with customary excellence. Rather than burdening the federal courts with these hidden institutional costs, Congress should recognize that there is no cost-free way to improve the administration of the criminal law, and despite the pressure to reduce federal spending, it should assist state courts with a substantial program of federal subsidization

Administration (probate law · Austerity · Business · Criminal law · Harm · Political science · State (computer science · Subsidy · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Public Administration

• The Rise of Judicial Management in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, 1955-2000

  Kermit L Hall, Steven Harmon Wilson•The Journal of Southern History•2004

  Add to list

• The Effect of Federalization on the Defense Function

  Open Access•DENNIS E CURTIS, Dennis Curtis•The Annals of the American…•1996

  Add to list

• The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Paper))

  Richard D Lambert•The Annals of the American…•2001

  Add to list