Committees and the Norm of Specialization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9753744 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herbert B Asher (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 411 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 63-74 |
| Publication date | 1974-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/000271627441100106 |
| OpenAlex | W2134769315 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
The need for congressmen to specialize and acquire expertise in a limited number of policy areas is so universally conceded as to be labelled a norm of legislative behavior. Specialization is intimately tied to the ability of Congress to make informed voting decisions on a wide range of issues; congressmen often rely upon expert colleagues for information and advice on bills beyond their own expertise. More importantly, specialization, especially as facilitated by the committee system, is an adaptive response to the resource advantages possessed by the executive branch; specialization facilitates congressional performance of the oversight function. In order to determine why and in what areas a congressman will specialize, attention must be given to the member's goals, personal and professional background and electoral situation. Levels of specialization differ across the House and Senate, between national and state legislatures, across committees, and over time. Specialization, particularly as manifested through the committee and subcommittee systems, has both intended and unintended consequences. Foremost among the latter is the differential access to government specialization provides various groups. Finally, the extent of specialization will be affected by changes in the committee system
Congressman · Economics · Legislature · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
Entering the Committee System
The Impact of Redistricting on Latino Education Policy
Policy specialisation in the twenty-first century UK House of Commons
Playing the Co-Decision Game? Rules’ Changes and Institutional Adaptation at the Libe Committee
The President Proposes and Congress Disposes—But Not Always
A Natural Language Processing Approach to Identifying Partisan Framing of Climate Change Denialism, Fatalism, and Solutions in US Congressional Speeches
Informal politics
Parliamentary research services as expert resource of lawmakers. The Czech way
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,15 |
| Citation span | 1974 - 2025 (52) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |