Interest Groups under a Semipermanent Government Party
The Case of Japan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9760352 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Takeshi Ishida (0000-0002-3162-0857, Institute of Social Sciences at the University of Tokyo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 413 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-10 |
| Publication date | 1974-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/000271627441300102 |
| OpenAlex | W1991136913 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Despite frequent changes of name, the con servative party has ruled Japan almost continuously since World War II. During this period a particularly close triangular relationship has developed among government party, bureaucracy and interest groups; organized interests compete with each other in cooperation with their sponsored Diet members and their supporters in the bureaucracy. Since the beginning of the 1960s the tendency towards oligopoly has distributed economic power among organiza tions unequally, and this has been reflected in greater disparities in political influence among stronger and weaker interest groups. Economically strong interest groups, such as those representing big business, do not exercise pressure overtly, whereas weaker organizations must rely on mass lobbying in order to demonstrate how many votes they can control. Moreover, the more powerful interest groups who do not make their demands public are in a more favorable position in the context of Japanese political culture in which insistence on special interests is not considered legitimate. Business groups, for example, always justify their policies as beneficial for the national economy and for rapid economic growth. Recently, however, this national goal has been called into question because of the increasing pollution of the environment and the growing public resentment against oligopoly
Big business · Bureaucracy · Context (archaeology · Economics · Government (linguistics · Market economy · National interest · Oligopoly · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Resentment · Special Interest Group · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1981 - 2014 (34) |
| Highly cited | No |