Power, Politics, and Prosperity
Alternative Views of Economic Interdependence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9761609 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert D Tollison (corresponding author), Thomas D Willett (0000-0003-4757-7598) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 460 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-28 |
| Publication date | 1982-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002716282460001003 |
| OpenAlex | W2004391223 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
The widely different perspectives from which various writers approach issues of international economic interdependence can make this an extremely confusing area for the nonspecialist. In hopes of reducing this problem we attempt to briefly characterize and offer comments on the strengths and weaknesses of a number of the major schools of thought about the roles of power, politics, and economic prosperity in the political economy of international economic relations. In the last section we outline how public choice analysis may be used as a synthetic framework that incorporates major insights from each of these main schools of thought
Economic growth · Economic system · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics · Prosperity · Strengths and weaknesses · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1986 - 1990 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |