Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

State Constitutions in the Federal System

Bibliographic Data

ID9764858
AuthorsJohn Kincaid (0000-0003-3824-3254, corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume496
Issue1
Pages12-22
Publication date1988-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0002716288496001002
OpenAlexW2128646640
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited8

State constitutionalism has undergone a certain revitalization in recent decades due to the efforts of state electorates and officials to reform and modernize state government, the willingness of many state high courts to redevelop state constitutional law as an independent body of law, and the expansion of federal constitutional law requiring adjustments in state constitutional law. State constitutions remain important as instruments of local self-government even though the field of state constitutional choice has been circumscribed by federal constitutional law. A basic distinguishing characteristic of state constitutions is their reliance on direct popular consent and control. This characteristic is a matter of conflict in state constitutional change because it produces long and detailed constitutions subject to easy popular amendment. Despite reform efforts to streamline state constitutions and limit majoritarian influences, most state electorates continue to prefer more consent and control of government under state constitutions than are available under the U.S. Constitution

Constitution · Constitutional law · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • Finding the law

    James R Acker•Journal of Criminal Justice…•1990

  • Constitutional Recency and Support for Judicial Review

    Open Access•Adam R Brown, Christopher Krewson•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Key Issues in Intergovernmental Relations in the Post-Reagan Era

    Open Access•Robert W Gage•The American Review of Public…•1990

  • Opening the Third Century of American Federalism

    Open Access•Daniel J Elazar•The Annals of the American…•1990

  • Providing Opinions

    Open Access•James N G Cauthen•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2022

  • Was James Madison Wrong? Rethinking the American Preference for Short, Framework-Oriented Constitutions

    Open Access•Christopher W Hammons•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Publius

    Open Access•Kent A Kirwan•The American Review of Public…•1981

  • The Massachusetts Constitution Marks a Milestone

    Paul C Reardon•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1982

  • State High Courts, State Constitutions, and Individual Rights Litigation Since 1980

    Ronald K L Collins, Peter J Galie et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1986

  • The Purposes of American State Constitutions

    Donald S Lutz•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1982

  • The Principles and Traditions Underlying American

    Daniel J Elazar•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1982

  • From Covenant to Constitution in American Political Thought

    Donald S Lutz•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1980

  • Popular Consent and Popular Control

    James H Kettner, Donald S Lutz•The William and Mary Quarterly•1981

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,17
Citation span1990 - 2024 (35)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae