Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Loans Versus Taxes in Defense Financing

Bibliographic Data

ID9765812
AuthorsHarley L Lutz (Princeton University, corresponding author)
Year1941
Volume214
Issue1
Pages207-215
Publication date1941-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/000271624121400129
OpenAlexW1998703100
LanguageEN

expenditures is, in a sense, academic, for Congress has already gone a long way toward a final decision in favor of the loan method. To be sure, there were two revenue measures enacted in 1940, but the revenue to be anticipated from these acts will not suffice to balance the predefense budget unless a far different policy is to be taken toward nonessential expenditures than has thus far been manifested. Notwithstanding the camouflage that was attempted in the First Revenue Act, to the effect that the tax increases in this Act were for defense, the fact remains that there has been, to date, no actual taxation for the defense program, nor can there be such taxation until the predefense deficit has been eliminated

Balance (ability · Business · Camouflage · Economics · Gross income · Loan · Public economics · Revenue · Revenue sharing · State income tax · Tax deferral · Tax reform · Tax revenue · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Finance · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae