Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9769511 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dietmar Baetge (Hanseatic University Rostock, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 622 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 125-137 |
| Publication date | 2009-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002716208328333 |
| OpenAlex | W4229520480 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
Although strong traditional principles have stifled reform of multiple procedures beyond joinder and consolidation, injunction claims by associations and commercial organizations have for some decades been more active in Germany than many European states. Since 2000, innovative experiments have been under way with a special model case procedure for investor claims and assignment of claims in antitrust. Both these approaches are likely to prove inadequate, but debates on reform remain cautious
Business · Consolidation (business · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Accounting · Corporate Governance and Law · EU Law and Policy Analysis · Merger and Competition Analysis
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2009 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |