Student Protest and University Response

Bibliographic Data

ID9776101
AuthorsJoseph R Gusfield (Department of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego, corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume395
Issue1
Pages26-38
Publication date1971-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/000271627139500104
OpenAlexW2143156431
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Present student unrest and activism is not a clear product of student university tensions or of discontent with education. Such tensions are accentuated through stu dent involvement in non-university issues. The pattern of activism and violence among college and university students in many countries has also existed in the United States throughout much of its history, reinforced and sanctioned by the self-governing character of American higher education. Contemporary student activism is continuous with that tradi tion in its forms but differs profoundly in its political and national character. Most American universities, especially the large and public ones, are highly "under-administered" and thus are unable to form and execute policies toward issues raised by student action and toward that action itself. Administrators lack power and authority to lead faculty or students in the formation of institutional policy. The plural istic and leaderless character of American universities makes student protest a highly traumatic event, while student discipli nary action, in its present form, adumbrates internal campus tensions

Action (physics · Character (mathematics · Higher education · Plural · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Unrest · Academic Freedom and Politics · Law · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub