Understanding consultation and engagement of Indigenous Peoples in resource development
A policy framing approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9782213 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brendan Boyd (0009-0007-0176-778X, corresponding author), Sophie Lorefice |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 572-595 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/capa.12301 |
| OpenAlex | W2905272262 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 22 |
Canada’s legal system has repeatedly ruled that the Crown has a duty to consult with Indigenous Peoples when approving and shaping resource development projects that are located on their land or could infringe on their rights. Yet, there are still incidences where Indigenous communities and organizations find formal consultation processes, and the approach to engagement taken by industry and government, to be lacking. We use insights from the policy studies literature to argue that generating more evidence and analysis about the benefits and impacts of development is unlikely to improve consultation and engagement processes or resolve resource development disputes. We suggest that a policy framing approach, which examines how the different actors frame or define controversial and intractable policy problems, can provide insight into why disputes occur. We examine publicly available documents and statements about consultation and engagement produced by Indigenous groups, Canadian governments, and industry to identify and compare how these groups are likely to frame resource development and consultation activities
Business · Framing (construction · Geography · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Policy development · Political science · Public relations · Resource (disambiguation · Community Development and Social Impact · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Mining and Resource Management · Public Administration
Supporting resurgent Indigenous-led governance
How icebreaking governance interacts with Inuit rights and livelihoods in Nunavut
Enabling Indigenous innovations to re-centre social licence to operate in the Blue Economy
Governance of Arctic Shipping
A practical framework to guide collaborative environmental decision making among Indigenous Peoples, corporate, and public sectors
Indigenous engagement in oilfield remediation
Articulating FPIC through transnational sustainability standards
A co-created model for self-determined development objectives in Indigenous communities
Editor’s introduction/Introduction du rédacteur
Throughput Legitimacy and the Duty to Consult
Speaking truth to power
Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice
Content analysis and thematic analysis
Approaches to Canadian Economic History
Frame Reflection
Increasing the sustainability of a resource development
Consensus Building or Constructive Conflict? Aboriginal Discursive Strategies to Enhance Participation in Natural Resource Management in Australia and Canada
From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Understanding Canada
Who speaks for whom? Implementing the Crown's duty to consult in the case of divided Aboriginal political structures
Neoliberalism, Mineral Development and Indigenous People
The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution
Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice
Ideas, institutions, and policy change
Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
A Typology of Indigenous Engagement in Australian Environmental Management
| Citations per year | 1.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |