Democratic policing”

Lessons from I pperwash and C aledonia

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9782515
AutoresAndrew Sancton (autor de correspondencia)
Año2012
Volumen55
Número3
Páginas365-383
Fecha de publicación2012-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCanadian Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00228.x
OpenAlexW2112721807
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas4

Recently, there has been much controversy and confusion about the concept of “police independence” in the U nited K ingdom and C anada. The concept loomed large during the I pperwash Inquiry, in which the alleged political direction of the O ntario P rovincial P olice was a major issue. These proceedings were partly concurrent with another A boriginal occupation in C aledonia, O ntario. The Inquiry's final report recommended adopting a “democratic policing” model, which is significantly different from the “police independence” model. This aspect of the report has, however, received little or no public attention. Instead, the O ntario government continues to support “police independence,” while simultaneously claiming to implement the recommendations of the I pperwash Inquiry. How to respond to groups of people who pose real or potential threats to public order has been a major issue in C anada, requiring political decisions that are too important to be left solely to the police

Business · Confusion · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Independence (probability theory · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Canadian Identity and History · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Psychology · Public Administration