Improving Interactions
Public Sector Reform and Parliamentary Committees
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9783187 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John L Nater (Member of Parliament for Perth‐Wellington and PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science Western University), Kathy L Brock (0000-0002-1469-9313, Professor, School of Policy Studies and cross‐appointed to the Department of Political Studies Queen's University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 67 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 644-657 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Canadian Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/capa.12597 |
| OpenAlex | W4405821596 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
A well‐functioning policy process requires a responsible public service that supports the government and implements its decisions, and a representative legislature that holds the executive to account for policy decisions and actions. Reform of either the public sector or Parliament alone is insufficient to ensure that the relationship between the two bodies works to the benefit of Canadians as intended. This article explores that relationship using committees as a focal point given their centrality to the operation of the policy system. It begins with a discussion of the role of the two bodies in the policy process and criteria for assessing any potential reforms, followed by a brief discussion of recent attempts at reform and their positive and negative lessons. We conclude by identifying three key reform options for the public sector and parliament to improve their interaction in this vital, yet often overlooked, part of the policy process
Centrality · Government (linguistics · Legislative process · Legislature · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Public policy · Public sector · Canadian Policy and Governance · Computer Science · Law · Public Administration · Social Sciences and Governance
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |