Solid‐waste contracting‐out, competition, and bidding practices among Canadian local governments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9783447 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James C Mcdavid (University of Victoria, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-25 |
| Publication date | 2001-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2001.tb02041.x |
| OpenAlex | W1981480714 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 4 |
Canadian local governments continue to rely on private contractors to produce services for their residents. A key expectation for those who contract out services is that unit costs will be lower than the costs incurred if public crews and equipment produced the same service. A principal reason for expecting lower costs is the assumption that private contractors are exposed to competition that induces companies to operate with mixes of capital, labour and technologies that are more efficient. This article compares public and contracted private production of residential solid‐waste collection in 327 local governments across Canada. Three complementary hypotheses that are grounded in the theory and research on local public economies are tested. The findings generally support contracting‐out as a way to reduce unit costs, although substantial public‐private differences occur only in communities less than 10,000 population. Further, where communities have divided up their residential solid‐waste collection between public and private producers, overall costs are lower than national averages, and contracted companies are substantially less costly than their public counterparts in the same local governments. Finally, in communities that have contracted out this service, the competitiveness of the bidding practices affects unit costs. Local governments that bid the service competitively enjoy a cost saving compared to those that renew their contract with the existing company
Bidding · Business · Competition (biology · Economics · Industrial organization · Population · Public economics · Public service · Service (business · Unit (ring theory · Finance · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Marketing · Public Administration · Public Procurement and Policy
Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain
Neo-liberal urban planning policies
Is Contracting out of Public Services still the Great Panacea? A Systematic Review of Studies on Economic and Quality Effects from 2000 to 2014
Has the Bubble Finally Burst? A Comparative Examination of the Failure of Privatization of Water Services Delivery in Atlanta (USA) and Hamilton (Canada)
Effect of modes of public services delivery on the efficiency of local governments
A cross‐Canada analysis of the efficiency of residential recycling services
When markets fail to deliver
Joining public accountability and performance management
Neither public nor private
Urban Governance and the American Political Development Approach
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2018 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |