Reforming Canada's federal health‐care funding arrangements
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9784730 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Béland (0000-0003-2756-5629, Department of Political Science McGill University Montreal Quebec, corresponding author), Trevor Tombe (0000-0003-0490-1685, Department of Economics University of Calgary Calgary Alberta) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 28-44 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/capa.12514 |
| OpenAlex | W4323317005 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
Federal health‐care funding has long been a source of policy debate in this country, a situation exacerbated recently by the COVID‐19 pandemic and the premiers' calls for a large expansion of the Canada Health Transfer. In this article, we explore four potential pathways policy‐makers might consider in order to improve federal health‐care funding. These potential pathways should allow policy‐makers to consider how to adapt to changing circumstances while addressing citizens' concerns and the demands of provincial/territorial governments. We do not support one or another of these policy pathways. Instead, we explain what they are and what impact they could have
Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Order (exchange · Pandemic · Political science · Public economics · Employment and Welfare Studies · Finance · Global Health Workforce Issues · Health disparities and outcomes · Law · Medicine · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |