Interactive contexts increase informativeness in children’s referential communication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9786989 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Myrto Grigoroglou (0000-0003-3881-618X, University of Delaware, corresponding author), Anna Papafragou (0000-0001-5435-1058, University of Delaware) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 951-966 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/dev0000693 |
| PMID | 30742466 |
| OpenAlex | W2912263008 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 6 |
Adults adjust the informativeness of their utterances to the needs of their addressee. For children, however, relevant evidence is mixed. In this article we explore the communicative circumstances under which children offer informative descriptions. In Experiment 1, 4- and 5-year-old children and adults described a target event from a pair of almost identical events to a passive confederate listener who could either see or not see the referents. Adults provided disambiguating information that picked out the target event but children massively failed to do so (even though 5-year-olds were more informative than 4-year-olds). Furthermore, both children and adults were more likely to mention atypical than typical disambiguating event components. Because of the contrastive nature of the task, the listener's visual access had no effects on production. Experiment 2 was a more interactive version of Experiment 1 where participants played a guessing game with a "naïve" listener. In this context, children (and adults) became overall more informative, and the difference between child groups disappeared. We conclude that the informativeness of children's event descriptions is heavily context-dependent and is boosted when children engage in a collaborative interaction with a "true" interlocutor. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Event (particle physics · MEDLINE · PsycINFO · Task (project management · Child and Animal Learning Development · Language Development and Disorders · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology
Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See? Speakers Use More Redundant Color Adjectives When Speaking to Children Than Adults
Children’s comprehension of NP embedding
A New Look at Young Children’s Referential Informativeness
Distributional signatures of superordinate nouns
Structural diversity does not affect the acquisition of recursion
The acquisition of subordinate nouns as pragmatic inference
Pragmatic effects on semantic learnability
Children and adults use pragmatic principles to interpret non-linguistic symbols
The Ins and Outs of spatial language
Sources and goals in memory and language
Asymmetries in encoding event roles
Cognitive and pragmatic factors in language production
Sign advantage
Verbalisation and the One-New-Idea Constraint
Parents spontaneously scaffold the formation of conversational pacts with their children
Gesture Reduces Mapping Difficulties in the Development of Spatial Language Depending on the Complexity of Spatial Relations
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |